4 Application to financial planning
The example of this section concerns the process of portfolio management of financial
instruments.
Lack of directly
comparable market transactions
Vee.
=~
Estimation
of Fair Value
Complex interaction of
factors (geography, volatility,
credit risk, foreign currercy,, …)
Adjust market data
to reflect the potential
Use publicly available info
when deriving a valuation impact of complex factors
Use reasonables
assumptions and estimates Use appropriate
methodology
Simulate those of the parties v .
In an arm’s-length transaction Take Into acc ount
materiality considerations
Take into account subsequent events
Providing evidences of old estimates
Abb. 3. The goals analysis of the Fair Value concept is the basis of the processes
definitions.
The management of unquoted financial instruments is especially difficult. In order
to define the process model of unquoted financial instruments, a goal-oriented
analysis of the process is done, as can be seen in Figure 3. This analysis helps to
structure the content of international standards, such as the IAS 39 « Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement » [2], into a process model compliant to
ISO/IEC 15504. This results into a description of the different processes useful for the
management of a portfolio of unquoted financial instruments: the process of
recognition, derecognition, impairment, measurement method selection, measurement
method application (i.e. measurement), information collection and validation, ... are
described through their goals they have to fulfill, instead of their operational or
regulatory details. This will be the cornerstone of the Business Unit Manager to
define the process performance indicators. For instance, he can define the
effectiveness of the measurement process by assessing the number of subsequent
events invalidating previous estimates. Note that the indicators that can be given by
the ISO/IEC 15504 process models concerns both performance and operational risks.
This implies that they can be used to evaluate the incentives given to the employees,
34