Volltext: How do states without defence forces defend themselves?

neutrality was highly regarded. Harder heads prevailed and once again, due to the importance 
of Icelandic geography in monitoring Soviet surface, submarine and air traffic US forces 
returned to Iceland under the 1951 Defence Agreement". 
The Iceland-US Defence Agreement is an agreement of eight short articles that gave bases in 
Iceland to US forces to operate out of. It did not specify the number of US forces posted to the 
country but it did acknowledge that numbers needed to be agreed with the Government of 
Iceland®. The US forces were known as the Iceland Defense Force and over the years 
included an air element that provided air policing and air space surveillance, naval elements 
including naval aviation for maritime patrol and a contingent of Marines for ground defence. All 
up during the Cold War the Iceland Defense Force consisted of just over 1000 personnel and 
included small numbers of military members from other NATO countries such as the UK, 
Norway and the Netherlands?'. The Iceland Defense Force served from 1951 until 2006 when 
the US and NATO decided that it was no longer required and it was disbanded and facilities 
handed back to Iceland. Despite the initial reluctance of the Icelandic population to join NATO 
in the late 1940s the US decision to remove its last forces from Iceland was met with 
considerable disappointment from Icelanders and their government”. 
Despite the disbandment of the Iceland Defense Force, Iceland still possessed vital strategic 
geography as it related to Russian air and sea movements. Following a number of Russian 
incursions into Icelandic air space the Icelandic Government made a request to NATO through 
the North Atlantic Council for rotational air policing from other NATO members. This was 
agreed to in mid-2007 and the first deployment of French fighter aircraft arrived in May 2008. 
Successive deployments have continued to the present day®. 
With Iceland's geography still strategically relevant to NATO it has been able to continue the 
policy of not maintaining military forces. With the existential and grand strategic interests met 
by NATO Iceland has chosen to only possess law enforcement capabilities, capabilities that 
have, nonetheless, actively pursued Iceland's national interests and contributed to Iceland's 
international security commitments. Iceland has two law enforcement organisations, the Iceland 
National Police and the Icelandic Coast Guard. It also has a mechanism to deploy both Police 
  
7? Valur Ingimundarson, Britain, the United States and Militarisation of Iceland 1945-1951, 
Scandinavian Journal of History (Vol.37, Issue 2, 2012), 208-212. 
°°) Defense of Iceland: Agreement Between the United States and the Republic of Iceland, 
May 5, 1951, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th _century/ice001.asp 
8" Iceland Defense Force http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/dod/idf.htm 
8 Valur Ingimundarson, Iceland's Security Dilemma: The End of a U.S. Military Presence. 
(31.1 Fletcher F. World Affairs. 7, 24 (2007)), 15. 
$5 Icelandic Air Policing https://www.shape.nato.int/icelands-peacetime-preparedness-needs
	        

Nutzerhinweis

Sehr geehrte Benutzerin, sehr geehrter Benutzer,

aufgrund der aktuellen Entwicklungen in der Webtechnologie, die im Goobi viewer verwendet wird, unterstützt die Software den von Ihnen verwendeten Browser nicht mehr.

Bitte benutzen Sie einen der folgenden Browser, um diese Seite korrekt darstellen zu können.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.