Herausgeber:
Liechtenstein Politische Schriften
Bandzählung:
35
Erscheinungsjahr:
2003
PURL:
https://www.eliechtensteinensia.li/viewer/object/000077483/138/
5.2.1 Country size and welfare We consider a set of independent variables similar to the set in Chapter 3, where we analyzed the determinants of government size (government consumption) to assess the influence of country size on welfare in mul- tiple regressions based on OLS, where standard errors are White hetero- scedasticity-consistent.106The results are summarized in Table 5.2, and there is a reasonable case for rejecting the central theoretical predictions. There does not seem to be any relationship between country size and welfare, even when we include a set of control variables which might help in explaining the sources of welfare. Again, analogously to Chapter 3, country size is measured by population figures and welfare by per ca- pita GDP. We are, of course, aware of the shortcomings of these mea - sures but have to stick to them, because they are available and harmo - nized for a sufficiently large sample of countries. Similar to Chapter 3, we use logs when distributions are very skewed. Descriptive statistics and the correlation matrix of all variables can be found in Tables 5.3 and A.16 in the Appendix. The results in Table 5.2 are clearly not in line with theoretical pre- dictions. The log of population is not significant in any of the seven mo- dels chosen. Furthermore, with the exception of model (2) the coeffi- cients are far from being significant, and we therefore clearly do not ob- tain a result that supports theoretical expectations. The univariate re- gression with a comprehensive set of 158 countries under consideration fares poorly with regard to explaining welfare. Due to the high number of observations, this is a remarkable result. In model (2) we arrive at the expected result that trade openness plays an important role in determin - ing welfare. This is the only model where the log of population is not far from being significant, but one has to bear in mind that we have fewer observations than in model (1), and the fit of the model is rather poor, which is somehow surprising, because we expected the variable open ness to exhibit considerable explanatory power. Note that the bivariate cor- relation between openness and welfare is surprisingly low107, but there is – as expected and in line with theories in international economics – a 138 
The economics of sovereignty: «secrets of success» of very small countries 106For details on the method and on Whitecorrection see Section 3.2.3. 107Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.220 (p = 0.029; two-sided).
        

Nutzerhinweis

Sehr geehrte Benutzer,

aufgrund der aktuellen Entwicklungen in der Webtechnologie, die im Goobi viewer verwendet wird, unterstützt die Software den von Ihnen verwendeten Browser nicht mehr.

Bitte benutzen Sie einen der folgenden Browser, um diese Seite korrekt darstellen zu können.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.